An analysis of socrates views on death

Instead, they are among his most devoted friends and loyal supporters. On the one hand, he drew a clear line between human ignorance and ideal knowledge; on the other, Plato's Symposium Diotima's Speech and Republic Allegory of the Cave describe a method for ascending to wisdom.

After all, it is not the particular person of Socrates which is at issue here, but the activity of Philosophy itself. In all of these, Socrates and the Sophists were criticized for "the moral dangers inherent in contemporary thought and literature".

In this dialogue Socrates explains who he is and what kind of life he led. At his age of 70, death would have soon arrived naturally. Also, according to A.

Socrates Critical Essays

Zeller for the simple and unphilosophic manner in which Socrates is depicted. On a more serious note, he rejects prison and exile, offering perhaps instead to pay a fine. He wanted to present Socrates in the role of a martyr, using that term in the very best sense of the word.

Table of Contents Summary Plato's The Apology is an account of the speech Socrates makes at the trial in which he is charged with not recognizing the gods recognized by the state, inventing new deities, and corrupting the youth of Athens.

In this dialogue Socrates explains who he is and what kind of life he led. The Apology ends with the speech in which Socrates utters a prophetic warning to his judges concerning the verdict that history will pronounce upon them for the actions they have taken in condemning him to death.

The lengthy presentation of ideas given in most of the dialogues may be the ideas of Socrates himself, but which have been subsequently deformed or changed by Plato, and some scholars think Plato so adapted the Socratic style as to make the literary character and the philosopher himself impossible to distinguish.

Analysis of Plato's Apology

In order to obtain answers to religious questions, intellectual Athenians would consult the popular poets, with their many stories having to do with the activities of the gods recognized by the state.

Socrates stressed that " the unexamined life is not worth living [and] ethical virtue is the only thing that matters. Again Socrates points out another source of the prejudice against him that has developed over the years.

His works are, indeed, dialogues; Plato's choice of this, the medium of Sophocles, Euripides, and the fictions of theatre, may reflect the ever-interpretable nature of his writings, as he has been called a "dramatist of reason".

But if he harmed the youth involuntarily, then he should be instructed educated -- not punished. His conversation with Meletus, however, is a poor example of this method, as it seems more directed toward embarrassing Meletus than toward arriving at the truth. Socrates did not accept these stories about the gods.

After making his defense, an account is given of his attempt at mitigation of the penalty imposed on him. Who would voluntarily corrupt the youth?

Trial of Socrates

Meletus, in fact, when questioned about it, insists that Socrates is an atheist. Plato's Symposiuma witch and priestess from Mantineataught him all he knows about erosor love ; and that Aspasiathe mistress of Periclestaught him the art of rhetoric.

Just as a gadfly constantly agitates a horse, preventiung it from becoming sluggish and going to sleep so too Socates, by moving through the City stirring up conversations in the marketplace, prevents the City from becoming sulggish and careless and intolerant thinking it knows something when it doesn't.

At his age of 70, death would have soon arrived naturally. According to Xenophon, he was a teleologist who held that god arranges everything for the best.

And, in a profound sense, those around Socrates, those who claimed a "knowledge" in the sphere of values, were ignorant of their ignorance. Perhaps significantly, he points out that midwives are barren due to age, and women who have never given birth are unable to become midwives; they would have no experience or knowledge of birth and would be unable to separate the worthy infants from those that should be left on the hillside to be exposed.

But now these people will bear the responsibility for it -- and they will have allowed Athens to be condemned for its condemnation of Socrates. Another view that was regarded as controversial in the fifth century was Socrates's belief that injustice is never justified.

It was the character of the man as seen from within that was especially noteworthy. In making his defense, Socrates did not attempt to prove that he was innocent of the charge of disbelief in the Athenian gods.

Socrates also questioned the Sophistic doctrine that arete virtue can be taught. Thus Socrates wishes to be judged and not "forgiven" or let off for any other reason than that it is JUST to do so.

He ought only to consider whether what he is doing is right or wrong. Athens was being ruled at this time by a democratic form of government, and if it could be made to appear that Socrates was an enemy of democracy, this would go a long way toward arousing popular sentiment against him.

After all, death is either one of two things: In making his defense, Socrates will reply to two kinds of accusations. The second one is more specific and seems quite probable that this is the one for which he has been indicted and brought to trial.

It was not only Athenian democracy: Injustice may appear to be triumphant at the time, but eventually evildoers will be given a just recompense.Plato's views on life after death were manifold, and developed over time as an examination of a bevy of his literature readily indicates.

However, during all phases of his writing he does demonstrate that there is in fact life after physical death, which is widely attributed to his notion of the soul. Condemned to death, Socrates, strong, calm and at peace, discusses the immortality of the soul.

Surrounded by Crito, his grieving friends and students, he is teaching, philosophizing, and in fact, thanking the God of Health, Asclepius, for the hemlock brew which will insure a peaceful death.

Essay Socrates and Thrasymachus in Republic Words | 9 Pages. Socrates and Thrasymachus in Republic Socrates and Thrasymachus have a dialogue in Chapter 2 of Republic which progresses from a discussion of the definition of morality, to an understanding of the expertise of ruling, and eventually to a debate on the state of human nature.

Analysis of Plato's Apology

From Evan Puschak, aka The Nerdwriter, comes an entertaining analysis of Jacques-Louis David’s neoclassical masterpiece, The Death of Socrates. The Death of Socrates is on display at the Met here in NYC.

From the Met’s catalogue entry: In B.C., having been accused by the Athenian government. In Why Socrates Died: Dispelling the Myths (), Robin Waterfield said that the death of Socrates was an act of volition motivated by a greater purpose; Socrates “saw himself as healing the City’s ills by his voluntary death”.

Character Analysis. Socrates is a man of mystery. We know he's a historical figure, and we know he was a famous philosopher, but we don't know a whole lot else. Instead of fleeing the death penalty as his friends urged, he drank the poison hemlock given him and became a martyr for philosophy, showing that even unfair laws need to be.

An analysis of socrates views on death
Rated 3/5 based on 31 review